I think this is AI. It’s not as bad as some, but it’s got that breathless enthusiasm and drones on and on without ever quite getting to its point.
AI is fine in itself. The only question are the numbers correct. I'm not sure how to validate them. The facts count the most important. The second is the article readable without being too wordy or any other such problems.
Pangram flags it. It also talks about "quietly" and "the gap". It's AI.
Yes, a lot of obvious tells.
[dead]
Pretty sure it's edited AI. Honestly for dry stuff like this it's okay, if a bit tiring at the end.