Mutually assured destruction has worked fine for 80 years, why stop now?
I don’t know if you’re being facetious, but last time I checked, the world had not been destroyed by glob thermonuclear war.
So yeah, it has worked.
Because the risk here is that permanent military superiority may be achievable without your adversaries having a chance to react, which is not the case with atomic weapons.
I don’t know if you’re being facetious, but last time I checked, the world had not been destroyed by glob thermonuclear war.
So yeah, it has worked.