logoalt Hacker News

computerbustertoday at 2:04 AM2 repliesview on HN

I believe wholeheartedly that AVIF's approach is significantly better UX.


Replies

zerataxtoday at 8:51 AM

why? in jpeg xl i get an image quicker and i can see it getting better, so i know it's still loading while the avif one looks stuck for the majority of the time, which makes it look already done loading and just low quality to me.

oofderetoday at 2:30 AM

What exactly is AVIF doing in this case that I can't do with two <img> tags at a smaller size? I can easily create a thumbnail that beats the AVIF quality in less than the 5KB delta between the static and progressive version in Squoosh.

show 1 reply