In my experience with the Claude Github integration, I found it to be pretty helpful. It’s had a pretty good success rate of catching bugs before they get to master, and for simple ones I can ask it to fix itself.
> you should have 2+ developers looking at most PRs
It’d be nice, but usually not the case in my experience. More eyes is better. AI review should not replace human review, it should supplement it. I find myself spending more time doing end-user testing instead of looking at code vs before.
Did you miss the part where I agreed AI should review PRs?