One thing glossed over in this article is that Irregular was not involved in the OpenAI–Hugging Face incident; this seems like important context to share.
That's cause Irregular was not involved in that event, they were involved in a separate event OpenAI published here: https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-invol...
In that article, OpenAI provides the context that this is a completely separate event from Hugging Face incident.
That feels less like "glossed over" and more "Headline is 33% false".
Do you mean "Irregular was not involved (we know for certain)" or "Irregular was not involved (as far as we know)"?