Khan has never been employed by a business nor ever run a business. She's never had to meet a payroll, nor prepared a P&L statement. Her entire career has been spent in research, academia, public policy, and government oversight.
And therefore shouldn't be allowed to have opinions on crime and antitrust? Is that your argument?
None of those things you list that she has never done help in any meaningful way with understanding antitrust law.
Lina Khan has never eaten breakfast cereal out of a boot, nor even a shoe.
So is the solution to only nominate corporate bagmen who have a perverse incentive?