logoalt Hacker News

Analemma_today at 5:37 PM3 repliesview on HN

Yes, every time people get grumpy about modern architecture and look over to see if I agree I tell the story about how I used to work at a company in Boston which moved from a beautiful 19th century building to a soulless Modernist steel-and-glass skyscraper. And thank fucking god: the old building was too hot in the summer, too cold in the winter, had too little natural light, and was too cramped. The Modernist building was better to actually be in in every way. Buildings are there to be used, not just looked at in pictures.


Replies

jiehongtoday at 6:53 PM

I'm pretty sure that some kind of hybrid can be found where the exterior could look nice and the interior would be very nice as well.

Now, not every modern building has to look like a glass and steel colorless brick.

For example, I really like the look of Oodi [0], Helsinki's new library: it reminds me of wood covered with snow, and the interior is exactly what you would expect from a modern building (built in 2018).

[0]: https://oodihelsinki.fi/en/

show 1 reply
tonyedgecombetoday at 6:36 PM

Le Corbusier: "A house is a machine for living in."

anon291today at 7:16 PM

It's not hard to make an old style building with modern amenities. I have a 1920s home and with like a few days of work it lives like a modern place. This is not some dichotomy.

show 1 reply