logoalt Hacker News

rishikeshsyesterday at 9:48 PM4 repliesview on HN

I think this is due to the data residency requirements in UAE. I'm working with a client in the health space and the government requirements requires me to store data only in UAE! Tried with AWS but they were not allowing any new instances and I had to go with Azure.


Replies

jackb4040yesterday at 10:03 PM

Hi, I'm from the future. You might want to consider storing the data somewhere besides an Azure datacenter in the UAE.

show 3 replies
dannyobrienyesterday at 11:06 PM

Hi, I'm from the past. When countries in the 2010s -- especially Western countries -- started seeing data residency requirements as an acceptable aspect of national policies, as opposed to a weird authoritarian thing that only China and Russia imposed on their citizens, we[1] spent a bunch of time explaining to their lawmakers that having geographical redundancy was a good thing, actually, and that you should stop insisting on where the data resided for jurisdictional purposes and start talking about where administrative access and encryption keys lived.

[1] OK, "we" here is probably just me -- it was one of those things where the chances of successfully convincing anyone was so small, and the commercial advantages of just nodding along, and then changing your product offering was so great, that really very few people raised it or had reason to. But somebody had to!

show 3 replies
tacticustoday at 1:35 AM

Check if the requirement is "only in the uae" or has to have the primary copy in the UAE

jbverschooryesterday at 11:14 PM

You can always selfhost

show 1 reply