That's actually a magnificent observation. This is not only an indication of a keen eye, but a trained brilliant mind as well.

> even Nvidia

Why "even Nvidia"?

They are fully behind using AI for basically everything.

What's next? "Damn, even McDonald's is putting out unhealthy food"

I get the impression that Nvidia employees don't care too much - I started seeing fully AI-written "documentation" on some of their smaller projects more than a year ago (i.e., before it was even slightly a good idea).

What are we for, I ask? What the hell are we now. Chatters to LLMs now? Is this our future? It really is starting to feel like it now.

Yeah. I think if the text is written for other machines, then by all means have an LLM generate it, but if it is intended for a human audience, have a human being write it.

We are still much better at writing in a way that doesn't waste other people's time.

I hadn't read the article and read this comment as though NVIDIA themselves were implying that this library was checked but not trusted by them since it was fully LLM generated.

It is the number 1 thing I cannot stand with Claude slop. It's a sort of anthropomorphization of language. Every "thing" does, produces, feels, wants, asks, answers, etc....

- "Launch is checked"

- "Question is asked"

- "The implementation answers"

- "The model wants"

- "The results name"

- "The connection surfaces"

- "The prompt wires"

- "The feature rides the mechanism"

Every single fucking thing is alive, wants things, and does things.

It's terrible. Infuriating. I want to rip my eyeballs out reading this filth. All. The. Time. "The anger is real".

not to worry, they have an 'AI generated summary' box too

Even their writing skills are getting rusty.

it seems like that's the way the industry is headed

Thanks, saved me a few minutes

Is that your honest load bearing assessment you’re going to flag?

Claude, rewrite my graphics card in Rust. Make no mistakes.