logoalt Hacker News

Roark66today at 12:54 PM2 repliesview on HN

Well the "non comparability" to gold has to do with the fact you need a functioning network to spend (good luck verifying a key by hand with a calculator). You can spend gold even when you're transacting with the last person on earth.

However the value is as much as people agree to value it and for a typical person both have little utility. Maybe BTC has even more utility because it facilitates remote transfers of value very easily.

So as long as the network exists there is intristic value in BTC. I believe more than one can say about gold.

Still, a good portfolio will contain both gold (in small coins likely as a kind of "war hedge") and BTC as a kind of hyperinflation hedge.


Replies

AIiscomingtoday at 1:10 PM

BTC has less facility in an emergency because energy is gone, internet is gone, bitcoin miners are gone and nodes are gone.

Your gold might give you food, your btc is rotting on some hard disk on a computer you can't / wont use.

BTC as a hyperinflation hedge? We have seen already what happens to btc when money gets tide: BTC drops.

erutoday at 1:20 PM

> You can spend gold even when you're transacting with the last person on earth.

Not really. Try using gold in retail.

show 1 reply