logoalt Hacker News

rwmjtoday at 1:39 PM11 repliesview on HN

It's Arm based, although they barely mention that.


Replies

minimeowtoday at 1:55 PM

Yes the lack of transparency on ARM architecture and the obfuscation of the RAM capacity with just the slot information is annoying. Not sure if it is deliberate to sell this at a premium to "mainframe" customers or whether its just their marketing folk not being on the ball. Fascinated by the fact Japan has a 2nm process node but I suspect that too is marketing. Perhaps the 2nm portion of the chip is done at TSMC and the rest of the package done in Japan or something like that. It's not like there's a plethora of 2nm Fabs around the planet to choose from.

show 3 replies
titzertoday at 2:26 PM

They actually do not in that article. I had to look elsewhere to find that out. Weird, one would expect that a big announcement like this would probably need to be vetted against licensing agreements with Arm that would probably want that fact to be prominently highlighted in press releases.

show 1 reply
gpderettatoday at 3:42 PM

Fujitsu has a long history of designing their own micro but using a standard ISA for HPC. Used to be SPARC, now it is ARM. IIRC Fujitsu were the main architects behind the SVE ARM extension.

nubinetworktoday at 2:13 PM

If they didn't mention SVE2, I wouldn't have known either... that would make it arm9 at the earliest...

show 1 reply
ameliustoday at 3:53 PM

But Arm is owned by SoftBank, a Japanese conglomerate.

(I think Japanese sovereignty is the main point of the article.)

shrubbletoday at 2:39 PM

Interesting to note that Fujitsu did this when the SPARC architecture was popular: they enhanced/developed a CPU for the same ABI.

Seems they have decided they don’t want to create their own architecture, but take the popular architecture and build on it.

show 2 replies
Animatstoday at 3:29 PM

Thanks. Looked for that in the article and couldn't find it.

What are the GPU capabilities?

mrweaseltoday at 2:43 PM

Not mentioning the architecture is rather strange. Being Fujitsu I'd expect SPARC, but apparently not. Maybe we're reaching a point where some circles either don't care or just defaults to ARM?

Obviously they can just ignore the license in the future and continue development out of a local branch, but it's also a bit disingenuous to speak of "sovereign infrastructure" and then use licensed processor design.

show 1 reply
thebeardisredtoday at 1:47 PM

Thanks I was, of course, looking and very curious what their tool chain story will be.

pertymcperttoday at 3:27 PM

Yes but it's their own design, not licensing Arm cores.

runmannytoday at 1:51 PM

[dead]