logoalt Hacker News

louthyyesterday at 8:35 PM6 repliesview on HN

Or … and hear me out on this one … care?


Replies

m132yesterday at 9:50 PM

Some hard to swallow pills for tech companies in 2026: data not collected in the first place cannot leak.

show 2 replies
AIiscomingyesterday at 8:59 PM

Lets be honest here, this is a business risk which is crazy high. As stupid as this is, I care but i can't guarantee it.

I might suggest a construct like this too.

What do you think how much it cost to do it perfect?

show 2 replies
plucyesterday at 8:39 PM

Every single tool being released since like 2024 is pushing everyone to care less and less and to let agents handle more and more. We are not trending towards increased quality, resilience and reliability - even though we've been obsessing over these things for the past 20 years.

ortusduxyesterday at 10:09 PM

That's more expensive.

augment_meyesterday at 8:36 PM

Sounds like something that costs money, if a university doesn't care I don't think most companies will.

show 2 replies
toomuchtodoyesterday at 8:42 PM

Caring is orthogonal to profits and shareholder value. The one who cares the least wins unless economic incentives change this math, which is what these financial penalties work towards. Humans are tricky.

To defend against the threat OP talks about (intentionally under capitalized corporate entity to avoided liability), insurance should be required, and your cyber insurance underwriter will perform an audit as part of underwriting. It's effectively a bond against fuckery in this context.

(cyber consultant and practitioner)

show 2 replies