logoalt Hacker News

augment_meyesterday at 9:32 PM1 replyview on HN

So we get to a very easy formula for companies to do in the EU and UK:

If (4% of your revenue * risk_of_breach_with_your_security < cost of outsourcing storage to a 3rd party cloud) {

Roll your own security solution

} Else {

Outsource to 3rd party

}


Replies

louthyyesterday at 9:46 PM

Your replies here suggest a level of cynicism that is, well, … , it ain’t pretty.

In my experience, putting proper compliance procedures in place, following industry best practice in relation to data management and data security actually leads to a more effective organisation, because it professionalises.

It’s the first step out of the ad-hoc phase of a startup and into the real world of creating a business with value. It also means as you scale up the personnel in the organisation, there are proper checks and balances in place.

When you come to sell your business, if it has a ton of existential risks attached to it, it will be worth less and may even not be sellable at all. So even from a cynical “all I care about is money” point-of-view, you want a business that is sound and isn’t storage for future law suits or fines.

Also, the cost of a fine due to a data breach isn’t the only thing to be concerned about. Gross negligence could lead loss of life, loss of property, loss of earnings, etc. and the buck stops with the executives — don’t think you can’t be completely fucked by the good ol’ law as it stands today.

Some businesses are more vulnerable than others, but that’s also why you scale the compliance architecture to the business.

show 2 replies