logoalt Hacker News

AI-generated posters don’t have to be horrible

1242 pointsby ereiamjhtoday at 9:20 AM693 commentsview on HN

Comments

nephihahatoday at 11:04 AM

Adding a safety pin to the punk design was too much of a cliché.

I wasn't a fan of the Memphis one as it reminds me of the worst eighties and nineties designs.

jdw64today at 10:19 AM

But if a designer improves an AI design and I feel it's fine, does that make me strange? If you ran a blind test on this, I think it would come out with high preference...

GPersontoday at 3:26 PM

The beige / slightly faded Claude design trend is atrocious.

gandhiandy69today at 12:45 PM

So AI slop is in reality prompt slop

glemmaPaultoday at 11:17 AM

Only the last poster kind of gave me vibes, the other ones are absolutely soulless and slop.

I guess it works for the target audience.

dzongatoday at 1:07 PM

once again judgment comes into play.

judgement + taste is the difference maker.

wiseowisetoday at 10:50 AM

> They’re OK

No, they aren't.

julio2445today at 6:12 PM

Julio

Razengantoday at 10:30 AM

Most AI-generated art is "good enough" for most one-shot designs by now (though still not [always] as good as a good meat-based artist of course)

The problems right now are:

- Maintaining a consistent and coherent style/aesthetic when you have to generate lots of assets for something. For example sprites in a video game.

- Iterating over a design for more than a few passes. For some reason most models keep degrading the entire image if you keep asking for edits to a specific part of the image. Or, some problems are or become impossible for them to fix no matter how you prompt them.

dude250711today at 10:25 AM

AI posters are not horrible, they just expose the person who "commissioned" them as trash. In a way, that is a good thing, since you can avoid them more easily.

show 1 reply
everyonetoday at 4:41 PM

This is hilarious.. The bad examples are ai slop. The final "good" one they make is corpo slop, lol!

shevy-javatoday at 11:05 AM

Well, sometimes AI generates pictures that are not bad. Personally though I am tired of AI slop in general, and I don't want to support it. AI literally kills humans. In some scenarios AI is still useful (e. g. if you write a game, say, in javascript and you don't have any designers helping you out, you could generate images that don't suck, quickly, via AI) but other than that the less I get of AI the better. Google now has that problem with AI - tons of AI slop and fake videos. I realised the AI slop just wastes my time but Google does not offer a simple "do not show me any AI slop" videos. After all they want people to waste their time on youtube, by design. So I now waste my time twice by using Youtube, if I watch an AI slop video.

jfewhfuehgtoday at 11:02 AM

If only there was a way to precisely control our output so it matches our taste and imagination. Some might call this technology, drawing.

miztahj866today at 8:32 PM

[dead]

lino_maltatoday at 4:02 PM

[flagged]

hellobuddy9today at 10:31 AM

[flagged]

andrey_chmerevtoday at 10:15 AM

[dead]

pizzaballstoday at 11:11 AM

[dead]

yanexrtoday at 2:27 PM

[dead]

ls-atoday at 10:55 AM

[dead]

Zardoz84today at 1:08 PM

Simply, don't use AI to generate posters and pay someone to do it.

satvikpendemtoday at 10:43 AM

As usual, AI is a tool and will be good in the hands of the wielder. I've been saying this since Stable Diffusion released nearly half a decade ago.