The parent comment literally said "You cannot do proof without intuition".
Therefore, according to that logic, an entity producing proofs must have intuition.
Edit to add: the parent commenter has now confirmed my interpretation of their statement.
Your unstated major premise here is that their intent was to make a universal statement about how proofs work and not just talking to humans about how they teach humans.
That premise seems unlikely to be correct.
Your unstated major premise here is that their intent was to make a universal statement about how proofs work and not just talking to humans about how they teach humans.
That premise seems unlikely to be correct.