My experience is that most people don't enjoy code review, which is why it must usually be actively encouraged and not just something that happens naturally.

Mechanically writing boilerplate is not enjoyable, and unfortunately in some languages and domains most of the coding is writing boilerplate. Machines can help with that no problem.

What is presumably enjoyable to most programmers is writing the parts where the actual magic happens. The translation of informal ideas into formal representation has beauty, like mathematics has beauty. Designing and implementing structures of code and data that are as simple as possible, but not simpler, is rewarded with a feeling of artisanal satisfaction and pride. Few things in life are as satisfactory as figuring out an elegant solution to a challenging problem.

None of the above are necessarily bound to the actual typing of words and symbols. AIs can help with all of them, and act as a genuine force multiplier. I would describe that as "responsible use of AI". Unfortunately, it seems that incentives are often against such use.