alt Hacker NewsBecause it's mostly not true. It is likely that it used the professors work, but the professor did not have a solution. It came up with new insights that solved the problem. Even the humans from the professors side said so.
Because it's mostly not true. It is likely that it used the professors work, but the professor did not have a solution. It came up with new insights that solved the problem. Even the humans from the professors side said so.
> Because it's mostly not true. It is likely that it used the professors work
These two statements appear contradictory.
I simply said that it may have trained on a NYU professor's work.
Work that the professor did not believe he was releasing for model training purposes. That feels worthy of mention.