logoalt Hacker News

monsieurbananatoday at 4:42 PM4 repliesview on HN

I never understood this, is there anything that makes it difficult for the original uploader, the one that supposedly offers the file directly, to offer a torrent instead for the same amount of time?

As far as perennity is concerned it seems strictly better.


Replies

zenopraxtoday at 4:55 PM

Every change to the source is effectively a new torrent. This creates a ton of fragmentation as data is reorganized, remixed, reencoded, and so on.

You can see this with many Linux distros: there is no single Debian torrent that people seed for years because there's always a refreshed version.

Distros are a bad use case for P2P anyway since you depend on upstream as soon as you start upgrading and installing packages.

show 4 replies
cube00today at 4:46 PM

If they're no longer using that model they may not be willing to continue using their storage for it.

show 2 replies
debugniktoday at 6:32 PM

You can add an existing HTTP download as a "web seed" to a torrent, so they don't actually need to do anything for people to share it as a torrent.