> So you're telling me that any problem a human starts working on gets solved simply because they are a human?

No? I don’t think that’s what they’re saying at all.

> there is now a machine that can solve a bunch of problems that have not been solved simply because there wasn't enough people with knowledge to work on them

That “simply” is doing a ton of work. A big reason there aren’t enough people with knowledge to work on these problems is that their basic needs aren’t met. If a slice of the money being poured into AI right now had been used to incentivise humans to work on these problems, maybe they wouldn’t still be unsolved.

> and all we have to do is supply power to get the answers?

That is again, quite reductive. The harms caused by LLMs, both environmental and societal, are much larger than “just supply power”.

> Irrational hate causes one to be blind.

Funny how it’s always the ones who disagree who are irrational and blind.