alt Hacker NewsThis isn’t a philosophical issue. It’s a legal issue. You’re trying to steer the discussion into the realm of the conceptual when it was always about the culpability of the company behind the AI that engaged in illegal behaviour.
Worse, you’re doing it in such a transparent, amateurish, and unserious manner that it’s difficult to find any relevance in what you have to say. Philosophy seeks meaning, your arguments lack it.
You and I can be interested in different topics. It's OK.
If my arguments are so bad, it should be easy to point out actual problems instead of sticking your nose in the air.