logoalt Hacker News

ViewTrick1002yesterday at 7:02 PM2 repliesview on HN

All these extra methods of preserving water adds cost, to a technology where paid off plants are struggling. Let alone ruinously expensive new builds.


Replies

samusyesterday at 7:18 PM

At least these installations don't need to deal with radioactive material directly, so they will have the same financial infact as similar improvements to, say, coal-fired power plants.

cyberaxyesterday at 7:19 PM

They don't materially affect the cost of a nuclear power plant. Cooling towers or evaporating ponds are not expensive. Coal and gas power plants also use them.

You just can't easily retrofit them onto an _existing_ power plant.