logoalt Hacker News

DoorDash Spent $1.4M Trying to Stop Mamdani from Becoming Mayor. Now We Know Why

257 pointsby vrganjtoday at 7:55 PM94 commentsview on HN

Comments

dayvidtoday at 10:04 PM

Ever since it was found that they took part of driver's tips for themselves, I didn't trust the company https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/feb/27/doordash-new...

dzongatoday at 8:34 PM

services like door-dash are literally built on a concept of a sucker pays more. you order a meal that costs $10. total charge comes to $25. then delivery worker made $5 on that order. + the delivery worker expects a tip.

which means the company sees both the delivery worker and the person who ordered as suckers. no wonder ride-share companies jumped onto food-delivery.

show 10 replies
Aunchetoday at 8:36 PM

Even though the press likes to give Mamdani all the credit for these types of things, this started with a law passed under DeBlasio, and most of the investigation was done under Adams.

show 2 replies
consumer451today at 8:44 PM

Josh Johnson has a great bit about Mamdani:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SCKj7gwbYrc

time4teatoday at 8:29 PM

What does "this is not a pay wall" mean - if I have to give personal information over, that is a price.

Didn't read - too expensive.

show 7 replies
mkageniustoday at 8:59 PM

> Founders: Tony Xu, Stanley Tang, Andy Fang, and Evan Moore (Stanford students at the time)

Guess never got a chance to learn empathy.

show 3 replies
ryanisnantoday at 10:05 PM

Money influencing politics again exposes flaws in our democracies. Shocking.

thomasjeff1today at 9:36 PM

Uber wants DoorDash gone and DoorDash is just making it too easy.

sharkjacobstoday at 8:34 PM

If they were honest about it and said something like "we believe our actions were fair and legal and disagree with this decision" it would at least be ideologically consistent.

> In a public statement about the settlement, DoorDash said, “Simply put, we screwed up. Our mistakes meant some Dashers were underpaid or paid late. While these mistakes weren’t intentional, that doesn’t make them okay.” (DoorDash did not respond to a request for comment on its campaign contributions.)

This is villain shit.

show 1 reply
tamimiotoday at 10:07 PM

This is a reminder to the naive people who think things are getting worse financially because covid/immigrants/gas/AI/supplychain/[insert BS reason], and not just the 1% greed. Things got bad and living wages are not enough substantially after covid at the same time when billionaires are getting exponentially richer, and all above excuses up there are only to distract the public from this simple fact: your life is getting worse because someone way wealthier is stealing your money, and unfortunately legally too because who writes and approves these legislation and laws is part of the game.

show 1 reply
toomuchtodotoday at 8:20 PM

More evidence Big Tech valuations are driven primarily by worker exploitation. Keep 'em coming.

show 6 replies
dust42today at 8:14 PM

[flagged]

show 2 replies
xysttoday at 8:34 PM

only $1.4M? DD was not confident in their efforts to stop Mamdani. This is like a couple weeks of work from high priced political consultants in NYC.

show 1 reply
exabrialtoday at 8:45 PM

I'm not so sure this is a victory lol

nemomarxtoday at 8:33 PM

Seems like they spent more on campaigning than they did on the extra pay and fines here though. Who's making these financial calculations?

show 3 replies
cdrnsftoday at 9:51 PM

DoorDash and gig companies generally are a play to destabilize employment and turn as many people as possible from employees entitled to benefits and legal protections into contractors that can be discarded at whim. How is ordering, say, a pizza via DoorDash in any way better for you, as a customer, than ordering from a pizza place that employs drivers?