I define undefined behaviour as a bug in C++. Now C++ is memory-safe!

btw, it's not actually that hard to write correct code in C++, easier than in C because you have all the container types. The problem is that nothing will tell you when you write incorrect code - there's no guarantee.

Isn't one of the bugs around ten years old, now? Isn't ten years enough to call something a feature of the language rather than a bug?

I like Rust, but with this bug existing for so long, I personally no longer think of it as memory-safe.

Since we are not at some point in the future where that correct compiler exists and there is only one official compiler, the distinction you make is practically meaningless!