logoalt Hacker News

Show HN: Doom or Bloom, map your AI worldview

39 points • by transitivebs • today at 4:51 PM • 30 comments • view on HN

Map your AI worldview by answering a few questions, and see how you compare with others.

only takes a few minutes && free & open source && private by default && powered by Jev

I think this is a really important question for everyone to be asking themselves, and my hope is that this lil project helps to move our conversations around AI futures in a more balanced, productive direction.


Comments

thevinter • today at 6:34 PM

> log-in with X

No thanks? Also why do you even need a login?

➕ show 1 reply
cyclopeanutopia • today at 9:09 PM

P(doom) ~ 100%, checks out, but I'm an easy case.

purpleflashing • today at 8:18 PM

I tried to answer all the questions and it placed me in the extreme doom category while I would place myself closer to the center because I do not hold any particuarly strong opinions and I struggled to answer coherently some questions (e.g. I don't "expect" anything of the future or AI, I don't think "good future" is something I can conceptualize, same for "harm" on the level of society, etc.)

➕ show 1 reply
Suhinnall27 • today at 6:01 PM

I believe your correct that this is a question everybody should ask themselves, and it would be very interesting to see how varied the responses are. I feel AI has been both a blessing and curse, and I hope it doesn't solely become the later.

➕ show 1 reply
chroma_zone • today at 8:18 PM

What are the "simulated answers" for the public figures based on? They don't seem to be direct quotes, so I assume they're AI-generated in their voice from the sources? I'd make that more clear since you risk misrepresenting people's opinions.

➕ show 1 reply
in-silico • today at 8:40 PM

The public figure viewer would be way better to use if I could inspect entries without opening a new page.

zaphar • today at 7:19 PM

Depending on what exactly this analysis means by Human Choices I either think it captured me well or got me completely wrong:

   Human choices can make limited changes, but dominant forces constrain the outcome.
I actually believe Human Choice is the dominant force here. But I expect aggregate human choice to limit the changes a single individual can have on the global outcome.
➕ show 1 reply
Marha01 • today at 6:57 PM

Gary Marcus in the center? He is a strong AI skeptic, I think he should be lower, away from the "Civilizational change" direction.

➕ show 2 replies
ctoth • today at 6:30 PM

Bloom (like a mold)

ecommerceguy • today at 8:41 PM

I couldnt get past 30%. Useless.

ddxv • today at 6:43 PM

P doom < 1 percent and at the bottom closest to incremental change.

edit: I would be curious to see how I'd changed over time as well. I would guess I was much more worried a year ago

➕ show 1 reply
grey-area • today at 7:37 PM

Unask the question.

Perhaps step outside this foolish dichotomy and consider whether LLMs are being vastly oversold as tools (no AI is not all LLMs and it's foolish to conflate the two). They can be useful in certain domains, they can be a useful crutch in helping humans think. Jumping from there to they will turn us all to grey goo or trigger a fucking renaissance is just unthinking acceptance of what you've been told by marketers and flimflam merchants like Altman and Musk selling you a dream.

The only doom LLMs could bring, which we're already seeing, is the enshittification of our shared spaces; infesting them with a simulacrum of thought and creativity, dumbing us all down till we think advertising copy is good writing and sloppy, shiny, happy images are the only kind of art we need.

➕ show 1 reply
ModernMech • today at 7:08 PM

Needs more dimensions for net worth and social media audience size.

➕ show 1 reply
mattmcal • today at 7:28 PM

[dead]