logoalt Hacker News

themgt • today at 3:52 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

Seems highly plausible AI/robotics will lead a significant decline in public schooling in the near future. Kids honestly might learn better doing a few hours a day one-on-one with 2026 frontier AI than sitting in a classroom of 30 with a teacher. 2027, 2028, 2029?

Modern public education itself is industrial revolution technology. Why would it be left as-is after the intelligence revolution?


Replies

ACCount39 • today at 4:34 PM

AI improves a student's ability to learn. It does nothing to improve a student's motivation to learn.

Motivating students to learn is not at all a solved task. And arguably a harder one too. Even the ~2010 "Google and grit" self-teaching is enough to outperform public education - but most students don't have the motivation to pull that off in practice. They have the opportunity, but that matters little if they don't use it.

Espressosaurus • today at 3:55 PM

No, they think they learn, then when they need to use that knowledge it turns out they learned nothing.

➕ show 1 reply
Zigurd • today at 5:10 PM

That's a very attractive idea. KhanMigo was supposed to embody that potential. Seems like it hasn't.

Some kids really enjoy learning. Never mind merely solving an educational assessments problem, personalized learning seems like it has the potential to unlock a lot of intellect across the population. And yet.

sneak • today at 4:54 PM

Modern public education is just state subsidized daycare to keep the population at their 9-5.

password54321 • today at 4:20 PM

There is a 99% probability this will not happen in your lifetime. Half the point of school is so someone has supervision over children for 6 hours and to be part of a small community.

If anything, if someone is looking for an AI proof job while not wanting to do something braindead, teaching might be one of the good jobs that may get more competitive.