logoalt Hacker News

loeg • today at 5:03 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

If you ignore it, do you continue allowing edits to the file? Now undo history is corrupt and useless anyway. Or do you disallow editing until the user manually deletes some hidden, implementation-detail file for a feature they probably never use?


Replies

xoa • today at 5:11 PM

If making a breaking change to the format of the file, why in root's name would neovim not just make its own new file!? Import the vim version if that's desired into persistent-undo.neovim and then just go from there. I don't understand their choice here at all nor why you're acting like this is complicated or there was some need for them to reuse the exact same file as vim?

➕ show 2 replies
physicalecon • today at 5:18 PM

[dead]