logoalt Hacker News

netvarun • today at 6:31 PM • 7 replies • view on HN

Off topic:With sol pricing drop tbh kimi k3’s value prop has not been that great. For our internal use case/testing/benchmarks sol come out with way better quality and much cheaper costs. Kimi really needs to drop their pricing (I heard it’s set by them across all the neoclouds) Sol is at 2/10 vs kimi’s 3/15


Replies

drob518 • today at 6:45 PM

Agreed. Even on the open weight side, GLM 5.3 has roughly equivalent performance to Kimi K3 for less than half the cost.

pornel • today at 7:31 PM

Competition is good. Without K3/GLM/DS4 etc. there would be no pressure on OpenAI to drop Sol's price.

nicce • today at 8:25 PM

Sol pricing dropped but so did the quality few days ago. I wonder when these companies are sued for making the terms from their side to go downwards while taking the same subscription cost.

➕ show 3 replies
k__ • today at 9:17 PM

With DeepSeek's pricing, no other value prop has been great.

nostrebored • today at 6:53 PM

Agreed, I think the only place where it’s still interesting is ui design. Visually kimi and muse feel much nicer than frontier models to me, but maybe it’s an artifact of everything terrible being Claude Design

7777777phil • today at 8:02 PM

I was surprised by that. I run my benchmark [1] every couple of days and was sure this model will be ath the pareto frontier, if not THE pareto frontier. But no:

Ember isn't picked yet. In planning, Opus 5.5 wins under the planning weights. In code, GPT-6 Sol dominates it: also 10/10, but with a higher quality score and a lower estimated cost. Ember has no intelligence index, so its starting score is only 0.73, which holds its 10/10 down to 0.954 against Sol's 0.975.

[1] https://philippdubach.com/posts/jev-model-router-for-pi/

toasty228 • today at 8:05 PM

> With sol pricing drop

6 or 5.6? Because 6 is hot garbage