logoalt Hacker News

bradly • today at 4:04 AM • 5 replies • view on HN

I've never been on either side of one of situations, but if the company is doing well, why doesn't the company just take care of the human? These don't really seem like opening-the-flood-gates types of decisions and companies could just choose to do if they wanted to, right?


Replies

brettgriffin • today at 4:31 AM

You don't see the risk that is created when you allow unexercised options get called at a later date, when they're in the money, because the company is 'doing well'?

➕ show 2 replies
crossroadsguy • today at 4:20 AM

One of the reasons such companies do well is they don't entertain "such things". Sad. But that's besides the point.

hdgvhicv • today at 4:52 AM

Not taking about $5k or even $5m. A billion dollars is a hell if a lot of money.

➕ show 1 reply
dgellow • today at 7:58 AM

A few do, I’ve been really lucky to work with a startup that got acquired earlier this year and took really great care of the whole team, even people whose options didn’t vest yet. After reading so many horror stories of acquisitions that was a relief to see the whole leadership and team work together to ensure people are taken care of.

I wish that was the usual situation

xyst • today at 4:34 AM

[flagged]

➕ show 1 reply