alt Hacker News>I don't see how they can still credibaly claim to not know that the computer they control was going to do that
that's not intent, though. that would be negligence.
Replies
jordanb • yesterday at 6:35 PM
How many times does it have to happen before they no longer get to claim that they didn't intend for it to happen?
If it happens 50 times and they keep doing shocked pikachu face at some point they look like the toddler who tosses their sippy cup on the floor and shouts "oopse!"
➕ show 1 reply
cmiles8 • yesterday at 6:26 PM
Criminal negligence is a thing too
EGreg • yesterday at 6:41 PM
https://jtnylaw.com/2025/08/new-yorks-leash-law-realities/
Plaintiffs seeking damages must show that owners knew or should have known about the dog’s patterns. Past complaints or vet records help build a strong case.
➕ show 1 reply
Not a lawyer but I think training a model with hacking skills they explicitly prevent the public from accessing without doing anything to stop the model itself from using those demonstrates intent.