> What was this murder, if not a one-woman civil war?

Is this supposed to be an intelligent move? Is the distinction between a war and interpersonal violence really lost on you? A "one-woman civil war" is simply a sentence that fails to compile for anyone with even a passing familiarity with the history of civil wars.

It's ironic you speak of apprehending reality when you speak with such stretched symbolism as to render whatever your point was incomprehensible.

Can you try again without this goofy civil war metaphor? I have to as an exercise in good faith conclude this framing was somewhat unserious.