Plenty will say yes. We know this.

One of the Constitution's big failings is this sort of thing; deeply vague wording. What counts as interstate commerce? What counts as reasonable? What's considered press activity? What's considered illegal speech?

If you were writing a new one today, you'd define some stuff more.

What's the point of asking this here? Regardless of whether or not I think this is reasonable, my point about the wording being vague and subjective stands.