The specific problem isn't "it's not X, it's Y", it's using that pattern where X and Y are not correctly related categorical items.
Yes, I know how I structured that sentence.
"It's not a frying pan, it's a revolution" sounds like AI. "It's not an octopus, it's some type of crustacean" does not. The thing that makes it an AI tell is specifically FALSE analogy.
> "It's not a frying pan, it's a revolution" sounds like AI.
This is either hyperbole or it hasn't been re-checked since around 2022.