I believe the objection is because they are constantly negative, even before LLMs were a fraction of its usefulness today.
Every technology has its negative parts, but breathlessly pointing out the negatives gets really old.
Do you mean critical? They are expert in AI ethics, it’s pretty much their job to look for problems in the field. I’m not familiar with them but the posted article covers facts that are undeniable
Do you mean critical? They are expert in AI ethics, it’s pretty much their job to look for problems in the field. I’m not familiar with them but the posted article covers facts that are undeniable