alt Hacker NewsOn 22nd of July
> It was loading the data for a week already, and the speed of loading data has dropped to 4 kilobytes per second, and it will take years to load the dataset.
And then on 2nd of August
> It loaded maybe 1% of the data so far.
And then one year after
> I didn't load the data after a year. > I tried it with the fsync removed, but even then it does not work
Ok, I find this more entertaining than I should and almost unbelievable. I know that this codebase was heavily written by LLMs but the execution can't be this bad?
What am I missing and why would Supabase buy the product which can't even load the dataset properly?
Replies
Also hilarious that the rebuttal comment after a year had passed was "why are you using this release which is a year old"
You're looking at a software project months after its inception, saying it didn't work well then, and then asking why someone would buy it well over a year later...