logoalt Hacker News

ofjcihen • today at 5:20 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

Oh definitely, and I’m in the cybersecurity space so I’m already on the “worst case scenario committee” hah.

But the alternative just seems… so much worse to me?

A select few groups gating access to the ability to do everything seems like neo-fuedalism in the making.

And to be fair even the gating that we do have (daybreak, CVP, etc.) is already being circumvented via keys being stolen and sold on the dark web.


Replies

Loquebantur • today at 5:36 PM

Yes, a "select" (rather, self-selected) elite "controlling" AI according to their wishes, what could go wrong?

Clearly not a "better" scenario. The real problem though seems people feigning helplessness? You can't leave society "to its own". You are part of it and go where it goes. So better start steering.

When access to AI gives you abilities you cannot use responsibly, you shouldn't have access to that. Just like you shouldn't be allowed to drive a car or fly a plane or command a rocket without proper guardrails, safeguards, prerequisites, etc.

"General" intelligence isn't present in humans, why does it need to be in AI?

➕ show 2 replies