>I don't know. I'm just saying that every single building adds to the organization within the system, as does every single life form.

No, you didnt. You said

> > You're rejecting the behavior of both human nature and earthly nature Absolutely.

> The whole point of a city is to reject all that.

Saying the "point" of a city implies intent. You cant motte and bailey back and forth between intent and happenstance.

> You should probably engage with the second paragraph of my original reply:

If I am going to engage with your _second comment's_ _second paragraph_ (cause were skipping over your first comment I replied to and the first paragraph of your second comment apparently) that I was replying to, I would probably quibble over you trying to entwine souls and economic efficiency