alt Hacker NewsThis looks like the only kind of comment you make lately (to a Ai writing detector)
1. detectors are unreliable, humans are "writing like ai" now (first we shape our tools, then they shape us)
2. more people don't care as long as the content is quality
3. there is a spectrum of ai-human writing and how people make use of the tools, some good, some NS;NT
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47089907
---
While I am not without my critiques of the article (such as the lack of any measurements), I still find the ideas of interest (such as AST based chunking).
> detectors are unreliable
If you can prove pangram is unreliable I will stop using it. By prove, I mean show their false positives and false negative rates are made up.
> more people don’t care as long as the content is quality
That’s your opinion. If you want to read AI generated content then there are wonderful sites that can produce that within seconds.