> So we should judge each piece of evidence in a vacuum?

You're free to believe whatever you want about Meta. But no, you shouldn't point to non-evidence, interpret it through the lens of your prior beliefs, and then claim that it's actually evidence supporting your beliefs.

> Aside, if “a skill file organizing purchase history in markdown format” is the only thing you took away from that thread, you might want to take a closer look.

That's what that specific quote I was referencing was referring to. I already responded to the supposed prompt injection/security concerns above.