logoalt Hacker News

somenameforme • yesterday at 5:11 AM • 3 replies • view on HN

People immediately started suggesting that the idea to close the border to Chinese travelers was racist. After it happened you even had the ever-politicized Lancet jump in claiming that such actions were "anchored in fear, misinformation, racism, and xenophobia." [1]

Similarly, you're referencing a name that was uncommonly used. People mostly called it the Wuhan Virus, which would be a far more typical name than "COVID-19". Major outbreaks are regularly named based on their origin: Spanish Flu, Hong Kong Flu, Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Ebola, West Nile Virus, Marburg Virus, Zika Virus, Mexican Swine Flu, etc.

[1] - https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7133591/


Replies

happymellon • yesterday at 5:54 AM

> Major outbreaks are regularly named based on their origin: Spanish Flu

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu

> The earliest probable cases were documented in March 1918 in Haskell County, Kansas, United States

Oh.

➕ show 2 replies
SideburnsOfDoom • yesterday at 6:55 AM

> Major outbreaks are regularly named based on their origin: Spanish Flu,

Major outbreaks _were_ named like that, but as the other reply pointed out, the "Spanish Flu" did not actually originate in Spain at all.

It is for reasons like that, that WHO best practices now specifically say to not name diseases this way: https://www.who.int/news/item/08-05-2015-who-issues-best-pra...

> Terms that should be avoided in disease names include geographic locations, people’s names, species of animal or food, cultural, population, industry or occupational references....

refulgentis • yesterday at 6:02 AM

They were right, closing borders with China doesn't stop the virus from spreading, there's no scientific basis for that claim.

It's amazing how you had all those at the tip of your tongue, you are a clearly a learned medical scholar.

A peer comment discusses where the Spanish Flu originated, and illustrates the gap between what you asked the LLM for and well, how humans think and what the people you're talking to are actually talking about.

The LLM also went a bit overboard with the Wuhan Virus thing, it's a response, but it's hilariously out of context because, again, there's a gap between you're asking it for and what your interlocutor is communicating.

It's so confused that it's giving "Ah, but, people didn't say the thing you said was bad, because it was bad. The politically correct version was Wuhan Virus." - thus validating exactly what I said, the Chinavirus version was weird and bad.