I guess you’re right, I always refer to them as SE Asia but it’s technically considered East Asia. Thanks for the correction.
> it’s technically considered East Asia
This phrasing seems odd, considering that those two countries are firmly in East Asia, and would not be considered as a part of SE Asia by any definition.
> it’s technically considered East Asia
This phrasing seems odd, considering that those two countries are firmly in East Asia, and would not be considered as a part of SE Asia by any definition.