> The market does not fix the administration paying wind projects billions of dollars to stop development.

This would be the politicians I mentioned.

> The market does not fix the administration forcing coal plants to stay open even when they are losing money.

This would be the politicians I mentioned.

> The market does not fix the administration cancelling grants for clean energy projects and subsidies for electric cars, and adding tariffs to solar panel imports.

This would be the politicians I mentioned.

> And US car manufacturers are enthusiastically moving away from their efficiency goals.

I was unaware car makers were part of the energy supply industry.

> That market is not moving quickly to renewables.

Most car makers are creating more and more electric cars, some makers are committing to 100% electric soon. Increasingly energy efficient ICE cars take engineering time and money to make, money they'd rather not spend. By not making them spend it, they won't. They'd do the same for safety features if we let them.

And none of that results my core statement which is the energy supply market (and you knew that's what I was talking about because that's literally the topic) is still moving to renewables. More renewables come online every month.

Paying a wind company billions of dollars in damages is basically a wash, they spend that on another installation.

Show me where any politician on either side has made a real impact on any of these charts: https://ember-energy.org/countries-and-regions/united-states...

The US is switching to cleaner (coal -> gas) energy, renewables (solar and wind), and BESS almost entirely because it's cost effective and cheaper than the alternative.