logoalt Hacker News

colechristensen • today at 1:31 AM • 3 replies • view on HN

There's a difference between reproducing a signature in an encyclopedia or in some way that makes it clear that you are recording the thing as it is.

Putting a signature on a work is forgery and in most jurisdictions charged as fraud.

If you produce an artwork in the style of someone and then clone the signature of someone who produces art in that style, there is a reasonable case for fraud.


Replies

saghm • today at 3:04 AM

Yeah, the references to copyright/trademark in this thread are confusing to me. I feel like there are much more straightforward legal arguments against falsely claiming artwork is by a famous artist.

quaverquaver • today at 3:00 AM

you have to sell it (or deceive for material gain) for it to be fraud.

➕ show 2 replies
noncoml • today at 1:42 AM

When you are no-one, it’s fraud. “When you're famous they let you do it”