logoalt Hacker News

palmotea • today at 2:46 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

> The thing is: people quickly discover that even mediocre LLM-code with a mediocre LLM-review, is still better quality than what they hand wrote and hand-reviewed.

If mediocre code is better quality than what you wrote by hand, you've quickly discovered that you're incompetent.


Replies

alkonaut • today at 2:49 PM

> If mediocre code is better quality than what you wrote by hand

Most code I have seen and reviewed over my 25+ year programmer life has been no worse than mediocre LLM code.

It's not a massive sample, but to me it suggests, most code programmers write, is somewhere between bad and mediocre.

And here's the appeal of the models: if what you used to produced was bad-to-mediocre, and you can now do slightly better for much cheaper, that's a huge win.

➕ show 1 reply
satvikpendem • today at 5:25 PM

Surprise, most coders are actually incompetent. LLMs therefore do write better than most.