logoalt Hacker News

ks2048 • yesterday at 10:44 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

I think they should put human names on the papers as someone who has reviewed the result, even if just a preliminary review. (I’m assuming they didn’t just pipe their model output directly to the internet and these had some amount of review?)


Replies

xpct • yesterday at 10:56 PM

Presumably they don't because they're training the audience (us) to trust the machine, not its verifiers, even if they were included.

➕ show 1 reply
agnosticmantis • yesterday at 11:22 PM

Long term this will be the only reasonable author list: Chad G. Peter {1}, Mat H. Lean {2}.

1: Author 2: Verifier

/s