so it's not really *random* that isn't random enough - it's the operator% that worsens it
Exactly. There's many a page on random which explains why taking the modulus of rand is the wrong choice, but it's also the easiest one, which makes it all to common.
Yes, but that wouldn’t work as clickbait.
[flagged]
Exactly. There's many a page on random which explains why taking the modulus of rand is the wrong choice, but it's also the easiest one, which makes it all to common.