logoalt Hacker News

weird-eye-issue • yesterday at 6:58 AM • 3 replies • view on HN

For most use cases is that actually needed though? Just having it choose between predefined responses seems like enough but I'm curious about specific use cases because I do feel like I'm missing something


Replies

ehe78qhe • yesterday at 7:06 AM

This is useful for classification problems; any time you need to write software that looks at some fuzzy data and needs to make a probabilistic decision. It's far more cost-efficient and performant to use this type of model instead of an LLM.

Before now you had to train a model on your specific classification problem, now these new models don't require any specific training at all to do pretty well on novel problems.

➕ show 1 reply
jstanley • yesterday at 10:31 AM

"You could do this before" "No, you couldn't, this gives you something new" "Yeah but I don't want it"

➕ show 1 reply
PaulHoule • yesterday at 2:47 PM

It is an absolute requirement if you want to build something that (1) uses a classifier as part of a larger system, (2) can be let off the leash with no human supervision and (3) is not an AI slop demo that will be [dead] and [flagged] in seconds after being posted to HN.

For instance if you have a predictive model for market prices that is not calibrated that's... nice. If you have a calibrated model you can add a Kelly better and you have a trading strategy that makes money. Similarly if you are classifying articles or images or other contents to make a feed you might believe that 70% or 95% or some other level of precision is "good enough" and you can set the knob and turn on the cruise control.