logoalt Hacker News

looperhacks • today at 1:11 PM • 10 replies • view on HN

lowercase m. 15 meters, not 15 million tunnels :D

If you're interested in secret tunnels, check out Colin Furze on Youtube!


Replies

shagie • today at 1:26 PM

Relatively secluded and private, Seymour Cray was also a tunneler... he wouldn't have been making videos about it

The story about him in Time at the time: https://web.archive.org/web/20080521163217/http://www.time.c...

    For Cray, the excavation project is more than a simple diversion. "I work when I'm at home," he recently told a visiting scientist. "I work for three hours, and then I get stumped, and I'm not making progress. So I quit, and I go and work in the tunnel. It takes me an hour or so to dig four inches and put in the 4-by-4s. Now, as you can see, I'm up in the Wisconsin woods, and there are elves in the woods. So when they see me leave, they come into my office and solve all the problems I'm having. Then I go back up and work some more."
And an article someone wrote later... https://michael-starobin.squarespace.com/blogcontent/digging...
➕ show 1 reply
Freak_NL • today at 1:29 PM

I wasn't impressed by the 15 metres, but it turns out that is the maximum depth reached, not the length of a tunnel.

tecleandor • today at 1:54 PM

Yeah, I though it was 15 meters of length, not that impressive... but it is 15m underground and '... 1,300 square feet of underground space, including tunnels and storage rooms'.

➕ show 1 reply
curiousObject • today at 2:43 PM

not 15 million tunnels :D

That traditionally would be described as “a maze of twisty little passages, all alike”

hidelooktropic • today at 1:16 PM

Thank you. I definitely read this as million.

wincy • today at 1:16 PM

If you’re instead interested in a book about a house with 15 million tunnels, read House of Leaves!

➕ show 1 reply
Scubabear68 • today at 1:34 PM

I read it as 15 million tunnels too, was very confused. Thank you!

➕ show 1 reply
triceratops • today at 2:20 PM

The most important comment on this article.

foobarian • today at 1:18 PM

That is still an impressive water table. I wish ours was that low :-)

➕ show 1 reply
librasteve • today at 1:17 PM

oops … sorry … now fixed