logoalt Hacker News

possibilistic • today at 2:56 PM • 2 replies • view on HN

These are "spy"marks, not watermarks:

https://brand.io/article/spymarks/

We need to inform everyone that this technology can encode database identifiers and enough entropy to uniquely identify you as an author (or downloader).

This extends to other forms of media as well.


Replies

moritzwarhier • today at 5:23 PM

Cool post, but I'm wondering what would a realistic way to avoid this?

It's not really possible to ban steganography, is it?

> That future lies halfway between now and 1984. So let’s stay off that timeline, shall we?

> Call a spymark what it is. A spy tool used to spy on you and everyone you interact with.

cubefox • today at 3:15 PM

They are not spymarks if they don't encode any personal IDs and are merely used to indicate that an image was AI-generated. I don't think Google or OpenAI use SynthID to include personal data.

➕ show 3 replies