OpenAI has expressed this sentiment by not submitting to or saying they will submit their results to peer reviewed journals.

I've seen a lot of breathless reporting about various mathematical things being "proven" on the basis of the LLM-generated Lean formulation compiling. We probably wouldn't declare that for a human-written proof until peers had checked the proof for errors

Anyone who doesn't understand peer review (its intended workings, its negative effects by implementation flaws, etc.) automatically assumes expression is beyond academic peer review, so thats potentially a lot of people...