logoalt Hacker News

shieldagent • today at 12:53 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

Six hours of continuous runtime is the underrated part here. Most one-shot demos fall apart well before that, so this doubles as an endurance benchmark.


Replies

jodacola • today at 2:16 PM

Why, I once encountered a running session longer than a day!

The agent had spun up a backward shell script to watch for the shutdown of another process, but wrote a bug in the script that would have left it running indefinitely until I got home and noticed it.

This was with Fable, no less! And it happened a few more times, though I caught them sooner.

I’m not sure runtime is an important metric at all. Shouldn’t we aim for 0 runtime with maximal results?

bilsbie • today at 12:58 PM

How do you get it to spend six hours? I’ve done projects where it would have benefited if it put in extra work.

➕ show 1 reply
ghboo0927 • today at 2:10 PM

Most of that time may have been spent on testing.

bakugo • today at 3:25 PM

The amount of responses to this obvious bot comment is somewhat sad.

kojee • today at 1:15 PM

claude slop, like from every comments you posted